" King James only " advocates say that other translations of the Bible like the NASB and ESV are inferior translations of the Bible and not as true to the original.
One may well ask why we should take the time to examine an issue such as the King James Only controversy. Are there not more important things to do?.
The King James Only Controversy (2nd Edition) Can You Trust the Modern Translations? by James White Answering those who claim that only the King James. The problem is that it is almost impossible to fully deal with this question in a play sims online free trial no download King James Only Controversy a dozen, or so, pages. The Roman Catholic Controversy. When used in conjunction with such fine modern translations as the NKJV, NIV, and NASB, the KJV adds a noble rendering to the list and is often helpful in grasping the literal meaning of the terms involved. At a particular point in my ministry the Zte grandx z777 began to open doors for me to work increasingly amongst unbelievers and new converts who had no Christian background. Later he made several tours of European libraries, examining and collating New Testament manuscripts wherever he went…Of all the critics of the nineteenth century Burgon alone was consistently Christian in his vindication of the Divine inspiration and providential preservation of the text of Holy King James Only Controversy Burgon regarded the good state of preservation of B Codex Vaticanus and ALEPH Codex Sinaiticus in spite of their exceptional age as proof not of their goodness but of their badness. In the Introduction, White claims to be writing for anyone struggling with whether to believe in the isolated inspiration of the King James Bible.